Brazil shows potential for national packaging and solutions at Envase 2019

Think Plastic Brazil

More than 20 companies participating in Envase 2019 at Brazilian booth Think Plastic Brazil showed that sustainability, design and innovation are the pillars appreciated by international buyers. The Brazilian presence in the event brought amazing outcomes: 570 business meetings; U$D1.06 million generated during the event and perspectives of more than U$D7.6 million in the 12 months following the event. The action occurred in September received buyers from  Argentina; Bolivia; Chile; Colombia; Ecuador; Paraguay; Peru and Uruguay. 

Participants: Antilhas; Cartonale; Copobrás; C-Pack; Cromex; Destak Big Bags; Embaquim; FFS Films; Fibrasa; GDM; Geraldiscos; Gerresheimer; Jaguar; Lord Brasil; Mega Embalagens; Neoform; Parnaplast; Plaszom; Sommaplast; Soroplast; Splack; Valfilm; Wyda and Zaraplast.

About Envase 2019

Brazil is one of the main countries in the event, and had its companies depicted in the fair institutional video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HPbBHzBZH4). With 300 exhibitors, 250 booths, 20 thousand square meters of fair and 22 thousand visitors, the meeting in Argentina is one of the most important in packaging sector within Mercosur, showing launchings, technological news and trends in processes. 

While trying to respond to these inquiries, the present gathering gives educators, heads, and students with certain perspectives through the issues and issues confronting advanced education, for the most part, and the control of showing writing, explicitly, as we look to devise evenhanded and helpful assessment systems. Despite the fact that the issue of educator assessment is inconvenient, much more in this way, for various reasons, is the issue of assessing instructors of writing. To begin with, there are political and ideological reasons that make assessing writing instructors an issue. The educators tend to look at this australiaessays.info who show writing on school and college grounds are very frequently underestimated gatherings: low maintenance lecturers or extra personnel procured for sad wages under woeful working conditions or graduate training colleagues abused as modest work while they take a shot at their propelled degrees. Second, there are educational reasons that make assessment of writing instructors dangerous. The structure calling ha r not landed at a uniform accord about showing technique in writing; rather, there are various contending, similarly practical models, extending from student focused to educator coordinated. One assessment technique or set of criteria won’t serve for all instructors anything else than it will serve for all instructional methods. For instance, when ar overseer is watching a writing educator directing a companion workshop, an assessment poll that inquires as to whether “the teacher displays dominance of substance” is for all intents and purposes inane. By what means can a writing educator display authority of substance in a solitary class session? The inquiries should be changed to fit the specific writing class being watched.

Innovation and Sustainability in Lectures 

Parallel to the fair, there was a series of lectures on sustainability and innovation at “Jornada de Envase y Medio Ambiente” (Round of Packaging and Environment). One of the themes showed was ‘BIG BAGS: SEGURIDAD, SOSTENIBILIDAD Y REDUCCION DE COSTOS ESENCIALES’ (Big Bags: Safety, Sustainability and reduction of essential costs), promoted by Eliana Andrade de Souza, from Destak Big Bags.